XS29L9B240453 1969 RT/SE

[Just 6T9 CHGR]

Saw this advertised on Facebook  Seems like a solid car although priced a bit high.  Tag has me wondering.....with a SPD of 4/30/69 its waaay out of sequence with other 240xxx cars I had registered....all in the 12/12/1968 range.

1969 Dodge Charger R/T SE
Gibsonia, Pennsylvania
$35,000
-1969 Dodge Charger R/T SE
-V.i.n. XS29L9B240453
-Real R/T SE car
-Painted in T3 Light Bronze Poly
-727 Automatic transmission
-T3 Leather Tan interior
-T3 Tan vinyl top
-Bucket seats & console
-Correct wood grain knob
-Built date coded E440 HP motor
-Single 4 magnum carburetor
-26" radiator
-Big Block Headers
-Dual Chrome Exhaust tips
-8 3/4 rear end
-3.23 Posi Rear differentials
-Factory Stripe delete car
-Power disc. brakes
-Manual Steering
-15" Chrome to the edge magnum 500 wheels all around
-BFGoodrich Radial T/A's all around

[Mytur Binsdirti]

Looks like a fairly sanitary driver. What's his ad got to say & how many millions is he asking?

[MoPaR 312]

Are you sure your not looking at the registry wrong???  My 69 Charger is 238XXX with SPD 3/24/69

Sorry I don't remember the whole VIN off the top of my head but it is in that range.

***EDIT: My mistake. Pretty sure my car was a St. Louis car. ***

[tan top]

Saw this advertised on Facebook  Seems like a solid car although priced a bit high.  Tag has me wondering.....with a SPD of 4/30/69 its waaay out of sequence with other 240xxx cars I had registered....all in the 12/12/1968 range.

  text in the Ad  don't match either  

[Just 6T9 CHGR]

Looks like a fairly sanitary driver. What's his ad got to say & how many millions is he asking?

Ad is quoted in my post

[Just 6T9 CHGR]

Are you sure your not looking at the registry wrong???  My 69 Charger is 238XXX with SPD 3/24/69

Sorry I don't remember the whole VIN off the top of my head but it is in that range.

***EDIT: My mistake. Pretty sure my car was a St. Louis car. ***

Yes St Louis (G) plant code are in that range of 3/69... Hamtramck like this example are not

[MoPaR 312]

26 inch radiators standard on RTs? Would that not be on the fender tag as well?

[hemi68charger]

26 inch radiators standard on RTs? Would that not be on the fender tag as well?

No... If it was a 440 4bbl with a 727, no a/c or axle package ( like a 3.55 or 4.10 ), then a 22" would have been standard.... Hence, no "26" on the data tag..

[MoPaR 312]

26 inch radiators standard on RTs? Would that not be on the fender tag as well?

No... If it was a 440 4bbl with a 727, no a/c or axle package ( like a 3.55 or 4.10 ), then a 22" would have been standard.... Hence, no "26" on the data tag..

Thanks!

[6bblgt]

a couple other mistakes on the fake tag  

neat old school Radial T/As

[Just 6T9 CHGR]

a couple other mistakes on the fake tag 

neat old school Radial T/As

[jefferson]

Priced a bit high?. This isnt the 90s anymore
35k for a solid RT SE to me would seem a steal. Not sure where your coming off as priced a bit high lol yea maybe 20 years ago.

[E86/A47]

Looks like a good deal to me. If I were in the market I'd make the road trip to go see it!

So is the fender tag possibly fake?

[Challenger340]

a couple other mistakes on the fake tag 

neat old school Radial T/As

Tehehehehe
It has "aged" well though....

[cbrestorations]

buyer beware...car is much worse than seller claims. Request pictures of rails and ask about damage that was poorly repaired. It is a lot more rusty than advertised

[VegasCharger]

buyer beware...car is much worse than seller claims. Request pictures of rails and ask about damage that was poorly repaired. It is a lot more rusty than advertised

did you sell your '68 (grinch) yet?

[XS29L9Bxxxxxx]

So, is the concensus, fake fender tag?

[6bblgt]

yes, the fender tag is FAKE

[MoPaR 312]

yes, the fender tag is FAKE

I doubt you'll share why even when your that confident. I have been comparing it to my fender tags and other than the missing inspection stamp I'm not sure what else is missing/wrong.  Maybe it's more "crisp" than my 50 year old tags???

[6bblgt]

in the original post   the SPD is 18 weeks off

[cbrestorations]

Well, another concern is the seller not mentioning the fact that the frame rails are patched together front and rear, even inner fender has filler in it after being straightened from an accident

[Challenger340]

Well, another concern is the seller not mentioning the fact that the frame rails are patched together front and rear, even inner fender has filler in it after being straightened from an accident

Thx for the Heads Up !  

Fake Tag ?
Severe underlying rust issues ?
Unseen/hidden/poorly repaired accident damage ?
and a potentially cognizant Seller ?

I mean WTF could possibly go wrong for some poor sucker in this deal ?

Name ain't HLPAG is it ?

[375instroke]

NOM, too, it sounds like.