Thinking of buying QA1 UCAs

[Dino]

Honestly I'm not sure if I need them, but the price is not too bad and I'm assuming the tubular design is better than the stock design. I'm not doing any track and don't think I need adjustable arms, but I could be wrong. I'm mounting the Borgeson box first. The front is just too loose, and on these pothole ridden roads the car gets real jumpy doing 55. I aligned the front myself and I probably didn't do the greatest job. Maybe the new steering box and a proper alignment is all she needs, but as long as I'm messing around with the front I figured the new UCAs might be a good idea. What do you think?

[Kern Dog]

Plenty of info right here:

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,143101.0.html

In short, these got me to 8 degrees of caster and one full degree of negative camber. The car rides and steers great.
Good luck.

[Derwud]

The thing I like about the QA-1 UCA's, Bushings instead of Heims.. What I do not like, lack of adjustability.

They are good Arms and will make your car drive WAY better than stock!

[Dino]

Plenty of info right here:

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,143101.0.html

In short, these got me to 8 degrees of caster and one full degree of negative camber. The car rides and steers great.
Good luck.

I didn't realize you had those, and I followed that thread to align my car. 

The thing I like about the QA-1 UCA's, Bushings instead of Heims.. What I do not like, lack of adjustability.

They are good Arms and will make your car drive WAY better than stock!

If I can get the proper caster our of it then I should be fine. This car sees 90% in town crappy roads, and 10% highway. Which ones are you running?

[Kern Dog]

I don't see why anyone would complain about a lack of adjustability. The tubular aftermarket UCAs are supposed to have additional caster built in. What more do you want?