DodgeCharger.com Forum
November 20, 2008, 02:03:11 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Please remember: this is the place to discuss Chargers - NOT the place to discuss politics. Political posts will be locked or deleted at the Moderator's discretion.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Dyno results (Engle Cams shoutout)  (Read 1888 times)
Chargerguy74
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 464


« Reply #20 on: December 17, 2007, 01:11:04 AM »

Ron - how would you calculate from a chassi dyno number to flywheel hp on a 4-speed car ?  take 75% of the number you believe to be actual ?     ie...    (guess) 556 x 75% = 417rwhp  ?   That is how I arrived at the numbers...        I remember it was 416.8hp and 442tq...     at the wheels...             


That's probably pretty close....a 25% drop from the crank to the rear wheels is reasonable. The problem being is that Chassis dyno numbers can be all over the map. Some read high while others are very conservative. An engine dyno can also be inaccurate as well....depends on the calibration/operator and correction factors.  Wink

Regardless of what the readings are/were....that is a pretty stout combo and i'm sure your customer is happy. Again, very good job !  cheers



Ron

Why do most people say you loose about 25% between engine and rear wheels?
Certainly the transmission, driveshaft and rearaxle rob power.
Just an example:

You run a car on a dyno with a 100hp engine you might get 75hp at the rear wheels. That´s a loss of 25%.
All the parts between engine and rear wheels take 25hp.
Take the same car and only change the engine with 500hp.
Now take away the 25%. You should have 350hp at the rear wheels. The same transmission, drive shaft and rearaxle now robs 150hp
compared to the 25hp on the 100hp engine?

This is why I don´t believe in that % stuff.

If it takes 25hp to move all the parts, it always takes 25hp no matter what engine.

Correct me if I´m wrong.



Mario


Efficiency is a ratio of ouput over input and will always be a percentage. Consider the input that is put into the car coming from the flywheel and the output is what you get at the rear wheels. A percentage is lost throughout the drivetrain, not a fixed amount. If the drivetrain is 75% efficient, then a 25% loss occurs. I do know that efficiencies do change at different loads, rated efficiencies are usually full loads. 75% is just a good estimate.
Logged

Looking For:
Early 1974 casting 360 HP block.
BB Bellhousing 2892513 (early 70 and early 72)
SB Bellhousing 3743959 11" (early 74)
Chargerguy74@hotmail.com
Challenger340
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 536


Better to be a "has been", than a "never was"


« Reply #21 on: December 23, 2007, 03:26:15 PM »

Can you post the actual Dyno sheet as well, to go with this 440  ?
Logged

Only wimps wear Bowties !
Rolling_Thunder
Old Timer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,215



WWW
« Reply #22 on: December 24, 2007, 11:26:59 PM »

Can you post the actual Dyno sheet as well, to go with this 440  ?

I guess i could go back and get a dyno print out of it and scan it...      give me a while - pretty busy out here during the holidays
Logged

Alex Campadonia

~1968 Dodge Charger "SRT8" --- 6.1L Hemi, 5-speed, 3.91 Sure Grip

~1969 Plymouth Road Runner --- 440+6, 4-speed, 4.10 Sure Grip

~1966 Plymouth Satellite Convertible --- 318 Poly, Torqueflite, 3.23 Sure Grip

http://www.iconengineeringinc.com
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.032 seconds with 17 queries.