News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

dropping fuel prices

Started by Silver R/T, October 26, 2005, 10:22:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

chrisII

Quote from: Todd Wilson on October 27, 2005, 02:18:33 PM
Quote from: tin_solider on October 27, 2005, 01:41:00 PM
diesel fuel is the same thing as your heating fuel.   It is just a different color.   The additive was added so that if trucker got pulled over the cops would now if they were running heating oil or auto fuel.    heating oil back than was cheaper the the diesel feul. It is a scam.    :rotz:

heating is refined the same way.   I am plaing on buying diesl fuel fro the pump and putting in my heatin oil tank.   5 gallons at a time.   sloww and steady wins the race.   better than filling up at 3.25 a gallon at the pump it is 2.95



next time ya have your oil burner tank filled, take a look..most heating oil is #2. it is dyed differently than "on road" or "off road"diesel beacuase they are all taxed differently. its all the governments scam.  all these arseholes are spoutin off about lowering gas tax when in reality not taxing gas wouldnt help the econmy as much as lowering or droping the tax on diesel. BUT, just like anything else they would have to find a way to make it up.
     How many here actually use oil for heating anymore?? over the last 15-20 years alot of oil burners in this area have ben taken out and replaced with natural gas.


Diesel fuel and heating oil are not the same thing. They are in the same family but different grades. Your heating oil is probably grade 5 or 6 which is a thicker almost gell like. Grade 1 and 2 are what is common in vehicles. Grade 3-4 are used in other applications such as locomotives and big diesel type engines in ships and generators. each grade has different sulfer content and designed to run in specific type running conditions.


Todd


Todd Wilson

Quote from: chrisII on October 27, 2005, 05:22:24 PM
Quote from: Todd Wilson on October 27, 2005, 02:18:33 PM
Quote from: tin_solider on October 27, 2005, 01:41:00 PM
diesel fuel is the same thing as your heating fuel.   It is just a different color.   The additive was added so that if trucker got pulled over the cops would now if they were running heating oil or auto fuel.    heating oil back than was cheaper the the diesel feul. It is a scam.    :rotz:

heating is refined the same way.   I am plaing on buying diesl fuel fro the pump and putting in my heatin oil tank.   5 gallons at a time.   sloww and steady wins the race.   better than filling up at 3.25 a gallon at the pump it is 2.95



next time ya have your oil burner tank filled, take a look..most heating oil is #2. it is dyed differently than "on road" or "off road"diesel beacuase they are all taxed differently. its all the governments scam.   all these arseholes are spoutin off about lowering gas tax when in reality not taxing gas wouldnt help the econmy as much as lowering or droping the tax on diesel. BUT, just like anything else they would have to find a way to make it up.
       How many here actually use oil for heating anymore?? over the last 15-20 years alot of oil burners in this area have ben taken out and replaced with natural gas.


Diesel fuel and heating oil are not the same thing. They are in the same family but different grades. Your heating oil is probably grade 5 or 6 which is a thicker almost gell like. Grade 1 and 2 are what is common in vehicles. Grade 3-4 are used in other applications such as locomotives and big diesel type engines in ships and generators. each grade has different sulfer content and designed to run in specific type running conditions.


Todd



You guys must have a different heating oil setup then I have seen.   The heating oil we have around here for certain things is a thick oil like substance. Which is a grade 5 or 6. We dont have heating oil to the houses around here anymore. I dont know as to if they ever had. Lots of older houses have doors for coal in the lower foundations. We heat with natural gas or electric around here. Out in the country they use propane.


Todd

Todd Wilson

Quote from: drailed on October 27, 2005, 04:59:29 PM
Interesting info Todd, I looked at a fuel ticket last week and CP was paying 2.24/gallon in Albany. I guess when you buy that much fuel they better give you some kind of break.


Yeah it was interesting. I figured the railroad here was a grand slam for making money. They come out and fill the locomotives when ever they want. I figured what ever the going rate for off road fuels was is what they charged the railroad. Not the case.  I also found out at one time my railroad owned a refinery not to far from my house It has a direct pipe line up into Nebraska to the big rail yard there and they piped diesel fuel right to the yard.


Todd

derailed




You guys must have a different heating oil setup then I have seen.     The heating oil we have around here for certain things is a thick oil like substance. Which is a grade 5 or 6. We dont have heating oil to the houses around here anymore. I dont know as to if they ever had. Lots of older houses have doors for coal in the lower foundations. We heat with natural gas or electric around here. Out in the country they use propane.


Todd

Quote

Alot of Hospitals and schools etc. in my area still heat with #4 or #6 heating oil which is pretty close to crude oil. I use to deliver it when i was driving a truck. Great thing about the #6 was that if you spilled a little bit of it on a dirt surface in the winter you just waited awhile until it cooled off and you could roll the mess up like a carpet. But most if not all of the oil heated homes are heated with #2, off road diesel

TeeWJay426

Anyone see the announcement from ExxonMobil that they made $10BILLION in PROFIT last quarter?? (Yeah, I said 10 Billion). Anyone still naive enough to think that the hurricanes weren't just an excuse to F*&$ the American public once more?
74 Charger SE, 400 HP, 4-speed

MichaelRW

Quote from: TeeWJay426 on October 28, 2005, 06:48:06 AM
Anyone see the announcement from ExxonMobil that they made $10BILLION in PROFIT last quarter?? (Yeah, I said 10 Billion). Anyone still naive enough to think that the hurricanes weren't just an excuse to F*&$ the American public once more?

I heard on the news last night that this quarterly profit was the highest of any American company ever. I'm all for free enterprise but this level of profit is obscene. Yes, I think we're being ripped off. Isn't that considered profiteering and isn't that illegal?
A Fact of Life: After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF.........

MichaelRW

However......if the oil companies were to put a good chunk of that profit back into new oil sources to become less dependent on the middle east I would support it.
A Fact of Life: After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF.........

RECHRGD

I heard on the radio the other day that even with the obscene profits, The Feds want to GIVE the oil companies our tax dollars to build more refineries.  Go figure!!!!!!!!!!!!!   Bob
13.53 @ 105.32

Charger_Fan

Quote from: TeeWJay426 on October 28, 2005, 06:48:06 AM
Anyone see the announcement from ExxonMobil that they made $10BILLION in PROFIT last quarter?? (Yeah, I said 10 Billion).
Yep.
Here's the one I read; http://apnews.myway.com/article/20051027/D8DGL2502.html

The Aquamax...yes, this bike spent 2 nights underwater one weekend. (Not my doing), but it gained the name, and has since become pseudo-famous. :)

Todd Wilson

Quote from: MichaelRW on October 28, 2005, 12:48:11 PM
However......if the oil companies were to put a good chunk of that profit back into new oil sources to become less dependent on the middle east I would support it.


The oil companies are not concerned with becoming less dependant on middle east oil. They will get oil from where ever and resell it for stupid profits.


Todd

Silver R/T

Quote from: RECHRGD on October 28, 2005, 02:26:37 PM
I heard on the radio the other day that even with the obscene profits, The Feds want to GIVE the oil companies our tax dollars to build more refineries. Go figure!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bob

yes, so they can make more money and rip us off
http://www.cardomain.com/id/mitmaks

1968 silver/black/red striped R/T
My Charger is hybrid, it runs on gas and on tears of ricers
2001 Ram 2500 CTD
1993 Mazda MX-3 GS SE
1995 Ford Cobra SVT#2722

2fast4u

  as of last night it dropped to $2.18 finally from $2.26....sure would be nice to see it go under 2 dollars and stay below that!  sheeesh!!
DODGE CHARGER--Fuel for Living!

Headrope

All this fuel price flunctuation is supposedly because of the increased price of oil per barrel, right? Then why does a quart of oil cost the same this year as last? That's what has me stumped.

As for the price of gas: It's going down, but watch yourself at the pump if paying with a debit card. You might find what I've found here - that the pump no longer shuts off at $50. Now that fuel is getting affordable the pumps will go to $75 before they shut off.
Sixty-eights look great and the '69 is fine.
But before the General Lee there was me - Headrope.

Troy

Quote from: Headrope on October 29, 2005, 01:49:46 AM
As for the price of gas: It's going down, but watch yourself at the pump if paying with a debit card. You might find what I've found here - that the pump no longer shuts off at $50. Now that fuel is getting affordable the pumps will go to $75 before they shut off.

I was reading about that the other day and it appears that the limit is set by the bank/lending institution - not the retailer. I think it just took them a long time to raise the limit. Weird.

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

RD

i dont know what to think of this stuff anymore.  I cannot control it, so I am done bitching about it.  I am not giving up my opinions on it, but seriously it seems that all our political action to stave off this "raping" of the public consists of bitching about it on this forum.  Personally, all it does is just piss me off (reading about the oil companies and their extreme profits), but yet I still do not go to my congressman, senator, governor, president, what have you.

I am not gettin on you all that like to discuss it, but seriously, does it really help us?  Are we truly venting or justing getting more worked up over a situation that is totally out of our control due to political alliances during this current administration (or the next for that matter)?

I am not asking that we all forget it, I guess I am just saying that if we were to discuss it here, do you not think it would be better if we discussed to the people that are paid to listen to us?  It is easy to type words up here (look at this post for instance), but it requires the same amount of time to write a letter to your elected representative.  Maybe we should focus the time from these threads and put it to use by contacting our elected politicians.

Food for thought I guess.


OH, and one last thing....  I have been meaning to get this off my chest for a long time.  For all those who say that gas is relatively cheap compared to a gallon of milk or a gallon of orange juice, I say this.  I do not drink 75-80 gallons of milk or orange juice every two weeks. :D :D :D
67 Plymouth Barracuda, 69 Plymouth Barracuda, 73 Charger SE, 75 D100, 80 Sno-Commander

Duey

RaceDodge, whatever you do, try to ignore the fact that Exxon's 3rd Quarter profit of $10,000,000,000 was more than the entire GDP of either Kuwait or the United Arab Emirates!  :flame:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20051027/D8DGL2502.html
73 SE Brougham, F3 , 440, 850 Pro-form, 727 w TA 10", 4.10SG

RD

Quote from: Duey on October 29, 2005, 11:17:53 AM
RaceDodge, whatever you do, try to ignore the fact that Exxon's 3rd Quarter profit of $10,000,000,000 was more than the entire GDP of either Kuwait or the United Arab Emirates!   :flame:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20051027/D8DGL2502.html

dude, i take that as sarcasm, but anyways I think you misunderstood me.  I do not like the gas prices, I do not like the oil companies making so much damn money, but what can I do about it?

My point was that bitching about it on this forum is not going to change anything.  WE should be bitching about it to our elected representatives and pressure them about it.  i.e. "do something about it, or find a new job."

That was my point. Sorry if I may have been confusing.
67 Plymouth Barracuda, 69 Plymouth Barracuda, 73 Charger SE, 75 D100, 80 Sno-Commander

Duey

Quote from: RD on October 29, 2005, 02:44:45 PM
Quote from: Duey on October 29, 2005, 11:17:53 AM
RaceDodge, whatever you do, try to ignore the fact that Exxon's 3rd Quarter profit of $10,000,000,000 was more than the entire GDP of either Kuwait or the United Arab Emirates!  :flame:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20051027/D8DGL2502.html

dude, i take that as sarcasm, but anyways I think you misunderstood me.  I do not like the gas prices, I do not like the oil companies making so much damn money, but what can I do about it?

My point was that bitching about it on this forum is not going to change anything.  WE should be bitching about it to our elected representatives and pressure them about it.  i.e. "do something about it, or find a new job."

That was my point. Sorry if I may have been confusing.

Not sarcasm to you, RD...indirectly back at the @#$#%@# oil companies, Exxon in particular.  I'm with you.  Unfortunately, I don't think the Government gives a rat -- they make tax money off the proceeds so it's not like they want to reduce their tax income either.  The only way I figure (not that it hasn't been tried before) is to specifically target on petroleum company only...just a few percentages of market lost to another producer = $100M's.  Don't ever thik it'll happen though...great ideas but coordinating such an action would be next to impossible...

Cheers,
Duey
73 SE Brougham, F3 , 440, 850 Pro-form, 727 w TA 10", 4.10SG

Silver R/T

well theres stations that do not make as much money Ive heard. Big companies like chevron, shell and of course exxon are the ones that make most profit. So I try to avoid fueling at their stations
http://www.cardomain.com/id/mitmaks

1968 silver/black/red striped R/T
My Charger is hybrid, it runs on gas and on tears of ricers
2001 Ram 2500 CTD
1993 Mazda MX-3 GS SE
1995 Ford Cobra SVT#2722

RD

Quote from: Silver R/T on October 29, 2005, 04:33:31 PM
well theres stations that do not make as much money Ive heard. Big companies like chevron, shell and of course exxon are the ones that make most profit. So I try to avoid fueling at their stations

i think that is a urban legend.  If I am not mistaken, Troy debunked that theory in a past thread which stated (i paraphrase) that the petroleum companies buy from one another just as much as they produce their in order to maintain a valid (oxymoron) profit margin.
67 Plymouth Barracuda, 69 Plymouth Barracuda, 73 Charger SE, 75 D100, 80 Sno-Commander

Silver R/T

wonder how low prices will drop. would be nice if they drop below 1.70
http://www.cardomain.com/id/mitmaks

1968 silver/black/red striped R/T
My Charger is hybrid, it runs on gas and on tears of ricers
2001 Ram 2500 CTD
1993 Mazda MX-3 GS SE
1995 Ford Cobra SVT#2722

Troy

Quote from: RD on October 29, 2005, 06:38:47 PM
Quote from: Silver R/T on October 29, 2005, 04:33:31 PM
well theres stations that do not make as much money Ive heard. Big companies like chevron, shell and of course exxon are the ones that make most profit. So I try to avoid fueling at their stations

i think that is a urban legend. If I am not mistaken, Troy debunked that theory in a past thread which stated (i paraphrase) that the petroleum companies buy from one another just as much as they produce their in order to maintain a valid (oxymoron) profit margin.

It's actually something less sinister than that. Stations themselves will buy from the closest supplier because it's cheaper. It doesn't really matter what the name on the sign is. Oil companies will also buy surplus from each other because it's sometimes cheaper to buy oil/gas that's already in tanks than it is to produce their own. As long as the demand is there then companies will find ways to fulfil the needs of consumers.

Even though demand is dropping because of the seasonal change, the problem still partially involves refining capacity.
The recovery of storm-battered refineries in the Gulf of Mexico continues. The U.S. Minerals Management Service said Thursday the gulf's shut-in oil production was about 1 million barrels of oil per day, the equivalent to 68.15% of the gulf's daily oil production. The shut-in gas production was 5.559 billion cubic feet per day, the equivalent to 55.59% of the gulf's daily gas production.
http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/markets/roblenihan/10249870.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA

When you guys say "profit" I believe you are referring to the actual dollar amount (a mistake) as opposed to profit margin or as a percentage in comparison to previous years or quarters. It may help to know a little about how numbers are reported and what they mean.

For example:
Royal Dutch Shell (RDS-A:NYSE) posted third quarter earnings of $9.39 billion, or $1.35 a share, up 67% from last year's $5.62 billion, or 80 cents a share. The latest period included a gain of $1.77 billion related to the sale of a Dutch pipeline and certain gas contracts. Shell's top line rose 8% to $77.44 billion.

Exxon (XOM:NYSE) posted third-quarter net income of $9.92 billion, or $1.58 a share, up from $5.68 billion, or 88 cents a share, a year ago. Results included a $1.62 billion gain from a business realignment.

Notice that one says "earnings" and the other says "net income". Very important distinction as Exxon's projected earnings were really $8.3 billion (only the estimates are out at this time). They also sold $.8 billion in assets - meaning that money wasn't made off the poor schmucks at the pump. As I stated the last time, the company had to sell $88 billion in goods to make $7 billion in earnings which is only 8.5% (hardly a home run in the stock market). The numbers are probably close to that this time as well.

I'm sure I just wasted a whole bunch of my time... :P

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

Duey

Troy, my economics handbook from college notes that profit/net income can be reported either in absolte terms ($) or in relative terms (% - compared to stated reference...previous qtr, last fiscal year, etc...)  I referred to profit, not earnings (revenue).  I'm not sure I get your point....rounding Exxon's 3rd qtr profit (net earnings) from $9.92B up to $10B is exactly what I referred to.  ???

Factually, Exxon's revenues (earnings) for Q3 exceeded $100B, upon which the $10B profit was made.  A 10% profit margin is pretty nice these days (although admitedly not as profitable as some other economic activities out there.) 

My focus was on the fact that Exxon's profits for a single quater alone exceeded the entire annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of either Kuwait or the U.A.E., both huge oil producing nations. 

What would be interesting to see would be a comparison as to how much profit an oil producing nation like Kuwait, UAE or Saudi Arabia makes per gallon and how much profit large petro companies make per gallon.  I think that some folks believe the OPEC folks are making money hand over fist while the petro companies just tack a bit of profit onto the petroleum they refine and distribute...

Cheers,
Duey
73 SE Brougham, F3 , 440, 850 Pro-form, 727 w TA 10", 4.10SG

Troy

I wasn't directly responding to you but ok. I guess I should have been clearer but all these threads run together after a while so I'm sure I already covered it. My point is that certain people only see the figure $10 billion dollars and freak out. It doesn't matter if it's profit, earnings, income, petty cash or some guy's salary as long as it seems like the evil coporation is trampling on Mr. Average Joe. It also doesn't seem to matter to them if the percentage over time is lower or if it's weak compared to other companies in the industry - only the actual figure. It just seems like a lot of money to some people even if it might only amount to .001% in certain contexts. When I say "earnings", "profit", "sales", "costs", "expenses", etc. they are usually the numbers that I'm reading off the income statements unless I state otherwise. With that being the case, Exxon had $100.7 billion in sales (Total or Gross Revenue) - not earnings (or income or profit). :D

I'd say that recently anyone with refining capacity should outperform a basic oil producer. The money isn't in the oil itself right now. I seriously doubt if Kuwait tells anyone what it costs them to pump oil out of the ground but if you ask Nacho he'll tell you that he can buy gasoline for roughly $0.27 USD in Venezuela (that's refined so it includes those costs as well). A barrel is equivalent to 35 gallons so at $60 per barrel the "producer" is getting $1.71 per gallon (of crude) from everyone else in the world. Figure that out. ;)

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.