Ok, it's here - as a work in progress - this is just as far as I've gotten so far. I've scoured the net and I'm sure there is some old/erroneous information here. I'm far from being an expert on them but I have more to add. The goal here is the same as the C500 list - document the cars, not the owners - as an open document.
Link to spreadsheet:
1969 Daytona Registry (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eqbINFf9lxR2ofXmsvAvtFtlp-0N9CA7KoPwlKYJMw4/edit?usp=sharing)
If you have pics such as an overall shot, VIN and fender tags, engine, interior, trunk, and possibly 'back in the day' type pics I'd love to link them in the registry. Send to:
1969chargerdaytonaregistry@gmail.com
(Please include a VIN in the email about the car you are referencing, TY!)
Right now the Google Sheet is open to commenting. Right click on a cell and add a comment. Sort any column by right clicking at the top of it.
I'm open to adding moderators who know Daytonas and would like to help with this project, send me a PM.
The Rules:
1. Do not share owner information - no names, phone numbers, or addresses more specific than a state. This includes previous owners. This is about documenting Charger 500's, not the owner.
2. Information posted should be of the publicly available sort. It should be info acquired by internet searches, viewing at car shows, car ads, forum postings by owners, etc. If in doubt get the owner's permission before posting.
3. Only change information you know to be incorrect. Only add info you know to be correct. No hearsay or 'I guy I know told me...' stuff, try to have photo resources, research, or first-hand knowledge of what is being posted. Post photo links and source links if you can.
:o wow ! awesome Job Homerr :coolgleamA: thanks for sorting this :cheers: , lots of good info :popcrn:
Quote from: tan top on March 07, 2016, 06:40:45 PM
:o wow ! awesome Job Homerr :coolgleamA: thanks for sorting this :cheers: , lots of good info :popcrn:
Thanks! Just getting started...
I tried logging onto the spread sheet yesterday to update some info on my old car and I could not edit any of the blocks.
Chris, it's open to comment only now. Right click on a cell and 'Insert comment'. I see these pop up on my end and 'resolve' them to add the info you input as a comment.
Great job on the list Homerr!! I see that it shows only one car having been sold new in Mississippi (Car 356129). If this is the car I believe it is, the owner lives about 5 miles from me. I'll have to check with him to see if it is indeed his car. Years ago he told me that the car was sold new here in Jackson, which is why he wanted to "bring it back home" from the previous owner in Louisiana. I'll let you know what I find out.
Justin
"CornDog"
Very cool! Thank you so much for doing this. I just sent you an email with some info on my Daytona.
Quote from: Q5XX29 on March 08, 2016, 09:07:28 PM
Very cool! Thank you so much for doing this. I just sent you an email with some info on my Daytona.
Thanks! I added your pic.
I also added a reference to dodgecharger.com at the top of each registry to steer people here if they happen upon it via google, etc.
Quote from: Homerr on March 09, 2016, 12:23:17 AM
Quote from: Q5XX29 on March 08, 2016, 09:07:28 PM
Very cool! Thank you so much for doing this. I just sent you an email with some info on my Daytona.
Thanks! I added your pic.
I also added a reference to dodgecharger.com at the top of each registry to steer people here if they happen upon it via google, etc.
Terrific, thanks! If anybody out there has any photos of my Q5 turquoise Daytona, I would be very appreciative if you would share them with me! Especially if anybody has any "old" photos of the car, from the 70s or something.
Quote from: Q5XX29 on March 09, 2016, 12:50:28 AM
Terrific, thanks! If anybody out there has any photos of my Q5 turquoise Daytona, I would be very appreciative if you would share them with me! Especially if anybody has any "old" photos of the car, from the 70s or something.
Should note that his car is 400570. ;)
Edit: added more pics of it in registry.
Quote from: Homerr on March 09, 2016, 01:00:48 AM
Quote from: Q5XX29 on March 09, 2016, 12:50:28 AM
Terrific, thanks! If anybody out there has any photos of my Q5 turquoise Daytona, I would be very appreciative if you would share them with me! Especially if anybody has any "old" photos of the car, from the 70s or something.
Should note that his car is 400570. ;)
Yes, that info might help! Thanks. :icon_smile_big:
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,100845.0.html
Quote from: nascarxx29 on March 09, 2016, 09:28:10 AM
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,100845.0.html
I have seen all of those threads/pictures, but thank you! Believe me, I have searched the forum for all of the q5/turquoise Daytona threads. I was hoping somebody out there had some photos of it back before the restoration, such as when it was painted plum crazy, or supposedly painted white with a brush.
I knew the car when it ws Eds I seen pics of it painted house paint white..Jerry Junneman previously owned it. XXHEMI aka Ed Cook might be able to help you on its info
Quote from: nascarxx29 on March 09, 2016, 12:33:54 PM
I knew the car when it ws Eds I seen pics of it painted house paint white..Jerry Junneman previously owned it. XXHEMI aka Ed Cook might be able to help you on its info
Again, thank you. When I first posted that I bought this car, Ed chimed in, and offered to dig up the photos that he had of the car, and then he never did. Then I messaged him a few times, politely asking him again, and he never responds. :brickwall:
So, I've tried!
356504 is still hanging around!
Quote from: benny70hemibird on March 10, 2016, 07:08:09 PM
356504 is still hanging around!
Good to hear. Can you send me/registry some pics?
Benny I remember the F6 Daytona prior Tony Waters car Is still hanging apart
Homerr, you are a God amongst us mere Mopar MORTALS!
Give yourself a HUGE 'pat on the back' from me and other Moparmen and Ladies!
I am in awe of your splendidness!!! :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:
I think your entry of 408029 may be a typo, and should be 409029 ( you show this one at the end ). 409029 is T5, T5, C6T sold from Utica.
I have the sheet for 409030 and it too was T5, T5, C6T.
Maybe someone can confirm.
Quote from: FJMG on March 11, 2016, 09:52:40 AM
I think your entry of 408029 may be a typo, and should be 409029 ( you show this one at the end ). 409029 is T5, T5, C6T sold from Utica.
I have the sheet for 409030 and it too was T5, T5, C6T.
Maybe someone can confirm.
Quote from: nascarxx29 on November 18, 2010, 10:29:27 PM
....
408029 484 mi Utica Dodge Utica Mi 9/4/1969
....
nascarxx29, can you confirm from original list?
I read that info from the WW copy of the ship list published in the newsletter? That version of the list shows no 408029 VIN and the rest of the info you show on that car shows up on that list corresponding to 409029.
I noticed a few of the destinations and dates missing, I take it your copy of the list was rather illegible? The copy I have in the newsletter is not too bad so rather than post here multiple times I can send you a PM with what my copy states in the "blanks".
line 158 381547 is a 440 auto car, F5 on white
line 470 414641 is an auto car, F8 on black
99% sure 163 381551 is a 440 auto, Q5 on black. Danny can chide me but I don't have my friends' VINs memorized...
Quote from: pettybird on March 11, 2016, 04:29:56 PM
99% sure 163 381551 is a 440 auto, Q5 on black. Danny can chide me but I don't have my friends' VINs memorized...
I would love to know if this can be confirmed, because I've never seen or heard of another Q5 car with black interior (although it would make sense that there is one or two out there). I've seen pictures of the one with the white interior, and heard of one with tan interior.
Another Q5 but with tan interior. http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,42030.50.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,85583.0.html
this thread will fill in some holes. (it is the one i mentioned in the pm, homerr.)
the thread contains a dated version of the database i started working on years ago, as well as numerous posts with individual car info. once i have a finished template, i will get the most recent info uploaded.
Quote from: FJMG on March 11, 2016, 01:23:55 PM
I read that info from the WW copy of the ship list published in the newsletter? That version of the list shows no 408029 VIN and the rest of the info you show on that car shows up on that list corresponding to 409029.
I noticed a few of the destinations and dates missing, I take it your copy of the list was rather illegible? The copy I have in the newsletter is not too bad so rather than post here multiple times I can send you a PM with what my copy states in the "blanks".
Ok, I changed 408029 to 409029 and updated it to XX29L9B.
FWIW I understand that probably all the cars on the registry that only have the VON and not the whole VIN yet will end up being XX29L9B cars. I just update as I run across data showing that, yes indeed, they are XX29L9B.
Quote from: pettybird on March 11, 2016, 04:29:56 PM
line 158 381547 is a 440 auto car, F5 on white
line 470 414641 is an auto car, F8 on black
99% sure 163 381551 is a 440 auto, Q5 on black. Danny can chide me but I don't have my friends' VINs memorized...
Updated. We know who to come after if you're wrong. ;)
Quote from: nascarxx29 on March 11, 2016, 06:46:08 PM
Another Q5 but with tan interior. http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,42030.50.html
Thanks- yes, that is the one I was referring to. So there is this one, the one with the white interior, the one in the barn in Illinois (? 4-speed car, uncertain which color interior), and mine (black interior with white stripe/wing), confirmed. Would love to know of confirmation of others.
Which Daytona has the most factory options?
Quote from: held1823 on March 11, 2016, 07:15:06 PM
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,85583.0.html
this thread will fill in some holes. (it is the one i mentioned in the pm, homerr.)
the thread contains a dated version of the database i started working on years ago, as well as numerous posts with individual car info. once i have a finished template, i will get the most recent info uploaded.
Seems I'm just the latest to take on this task! :cheers:
Quote from: pettybird on March 11, 2016, 04:29:56 PM
line 158 381547 is a 440 auto car, F5 on white
line 470 414641 is an auto car, F8 on black
99% sure 163 381551 is a 440 auto, Q5 on black. Danny can chide me but I don't have my friends' VINs memorized...
You are correct.
Geno, I made a mistake.
I worked on the registry a bit this weekend and added more pics and - more importantly - I fixed the permissions so you can view them.
Where do you go to view pictures? Off of the spread sheet or a different web page? Thanks
The VINs that are blue and underlined are a hotlink to the album, just click on it and then the link. Click on the pics in the album for the larger version.
So whats in blue are known recorded cars.And othrrs in black are unknown off or info on them .I will scroll see what I can ad
I used to own XX29L9B410772 if needed if have a complete history of its paperwork fender tag buildsheet info and numerous picts from new to restored
Quote from: nascarxx29 on March 14, 2016, 03:46:38 PM
So whats in blue are known recorded cars.And othrrs in black are unknown off or info on them .I will scroll see what I can ad
In blue just means a hyperlink to photos.
XX29L9Bxxxxxx = I've at least run across some sort of info that validates the car and input it.
xxxxxx = I don't have info/haven't yet input info/haven't found any info.
You guys more in the know will see some errors slowly get fixed. I started with that shipping list and it had a couple of oddities that I learned about and corrected over the weekend. I'm sure there are more corrections to be made. I'm sifting through all the info and trying to update it in chronological order so that I don't replace a newer correction with an older error.
Quote from: nascarxx29 on March 14, 2016, 03:54:48 PM
I used to own XX29L9B410772 if needed if have a complete history of its paperwork fender tag buildsheet info and numerous picts from new to restored
That's the red one that went to Canada? I was looking for vin yesterday. Yeah, definitely would love pics, especially older ones, paperwork, fendertag, vin tag, and new restored. I found the ones where it was being put on the trailer. Send them to 1969chargerdaytonaregistry@gmail.com
The shiplist had errors same car by vin going to different dealers.Its hard to read as being copied went from 381 daytonas to 543 thanks to greg k and anthony young.your doing a good job on this daytona registry
Does anyone have a clearer pic of the 926xxx number than this one here? Trying to clarify if it is 926841 or 926941. Fiddling with photoshop I can see it going either way. Or is the owner here? :icon_smile_cool:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B0yiRxRtmJ_xSlZBVzdvZHJ2RUk&usp=drive_web
the GG report for 409058
Thanks!
Wow, I might actually be able to help! I know there were attempts for this in the past, but they didn't seem to reach critical mass. Hopefully this attempt will.
Over the years I've collected mostly fender tag images of some Daytonas. I know that it is possible to have a fender tag reproduced, so I can't guarantee the accuracy of these images. And maybe somebody already has these, so if they are duplicates I apologize.
Also, I had previously worked on a little program to search a fender tag database and return percentages. Such as A11 = 100%, and was working on adding more options, such that you could find out how many A01 cars had a black interior C6X. I abandoned it a few years ago, but I'll try to find it again and get it working. I was at the point where I thought it worked but needed to input fender tag information, even just test information, but I got distracted and didn't follow-up with it.
Here is one fender tag, hopefully this will help. I'm not sure if I can type the information into the registry, but I'll let Homerr do at least the first one since he is in charge of it. I'll try to post some more if this is helpful.
(http://)
(//)
OK,here is another one, XX29L9B410769. What is strange is that the Registry has the other pictures I've saved, but doesn't have the Fender Tag, which I'm thinking I must have gotten at the same time. So I don't know if there is something about the fender tag that is questionable, and definitely not saying I think there is anything questionable because I wouldn't know, but here is what I have:
(//)
In addition to XX29L9B410769, here is another one.
XX29L9B400581
Fender Tag:
(http://)
Broadcast Sheet:
(//)
Broadcast Sheet Top Part:
(http://)
Broadcast Sheet Bottom Part:
(//)
This is for XX29L9B386546, however it is only the eBay ad from 2011. It lists the fender tag, but it didn't give a photo.
This one was interesting, I'm wondering if anybody knows the rest of the story.
(//)
Quote from: ksquared on March 25, 2016, 09:20:18 PM
This is for XX29L9B386546, however it is only the eBay ad from 2011. It lists the fender tag, but it didn't give a photo.
This one was interesting, I'm wondering if anybody knows the rest of the story.
(//)
Thanks for the info! I'll add later today.
Here are pics of this one. XX29L9B386546 (https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B0yiRxRtmJ_xdV90MV8yck1yVXM&usp=drive_web)
Maryland police auction 69 daytona
Quote from: ksquared on March 25, 2016, 09:07:34 PM
In addition to XX29L9B410769, here is another one.
XX29L9B400581
Fender Tag:
(http://)
Broadcast Sheet:
(http://)
Broadcast Sheet Top Part:
(http://)
Broadcast Sheet Bottom Part:
(//)
I believe that Daytona XX29L9400581 was sold at the MECUM INDY auction in 2009.
There is a picture of it next to my Daytona on page 37 of my B5 Daytona story reply dated FEB 14th 2011!
If there are archive MECUM results photos there may be more out there?
MJ
MJ
I've reached a milestone, I've now been through all 166 pages here in the Aero section hunting down info. The spreadsheet now represents what I could distill from a reasonable amount of looking. I purposely did not construct any other material on the side like owner name histories or license plate history. I've still tried to keep it about the cars and not the owners. But a few owners seem to have out-shined their cars, Joe Dirt I'm looking at you.
I'd like to think that with publishing all this info the cars will not only recorded for history, but ultimately be better kept so that clones or rebodies don't get passed off as originals. I've filled in the remaining VIN codes in column A and a google search will land on the spreadsheet. At this point there is at least some basic info for all but 100 of the cars. There are photos of 153 of them.
Thanks everyone that has helped and had input, directly on this project or indirectly through the forums. Thanks to nascarxx29 for being on top of all things Daytona here for years. Thanks to tan top for saving pics. Thanks to Aero426, hemigeno, Mopar John, 69_500, C5X DAYTONA, Troy, held1823, and many more of you for keeping the history and stories of these cars alive.
Over the last few weeks I've found myself pleasantly surprised with the more outlandishly painted Daytonas. Previously they 'weren't my thing'. I really have ended up liking most all of the 70's paint jobs, though they must have been the 'bling' of the era! Some iconic cars that have been restored back to stock seem kind of boring in a way.
On the flip side, I had to limit my re-reading of the OE Gold car threads because I absolutely get drawn in to the arcane level of detail, correctly dated parts, and factory/Creative process. I also really like a 100% factory car.
I'll be checking over the work as best I can in the next few days. Feel free to set me straight on any errors!
I am so thankful to you for all of your effort! This project will be an invaluable help to many people, for decades to come. That must feel good! My hat is off to you, sir.
Here are a few photos of Canadian Daytona XX29J9B414638, which of course is an original Hemi Daytona :o
These are from a discussion at:
http://amateurdebeauxchars.forumactif.com/t4625-dossier-69-charger-daytona-in-quebec (http://amateurdebeauxchars.forumactif.com/t4625-dossier-69-charger-daytona-in-quebec)
(Anybody good at translating French?)
Here is the youtube video of Jacques Duval test driving the Hemi Daytona:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlCk5KoCDF8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlCk5KoCDF8)
And does anyone think it would be worthwhile to have somebody attempt to contact people from these old discussions to see if they might still have the actual photos, which would hopefully be in color?
(//)
And two more for XX29J9B414638
My wife is fluent in French, I'll post a link to here later and see if anyone bites.
Here is a fender tag photo, but with the VIN blanked out. However, the order # is 926058, so I think one of the experts can match it:
(//)
I think it was from dodgecharger.com from 2007-02-18, but I haven't searched for it now to see if there is more information. Once again, hopefully somebody here will remember.
Quote from: ksquared on March 29, 2016, 01:57:46 PM
Here is a fender tag photo, but with the VIN blanked out. However, the order # is 926058, so I think one of the experts can match it:
(//)
I think it was from dodgecharger.com from 2007-02-18, but I haven't searched for it now to see if there is more information. Once again, hopefully somebody here will remember.
This is the Dressler Motors car, L9B356530
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,34131.0.html (http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,34131.0.html)
uncensored....
my own tag has seen better days.
interesting note about the car- dad worked for Chrysler at the time, and through work got wind of these cars being built. he told the dealership (where his '68 coronet r/t had come from) that he wanted one, and was told no problem, they'd get it for him. with so few being built, there was no discussion about colors, options, etc., as dad assumed it would be a "take what i can get" scenario. i have no idea if the car was ordered prior to allocation, or was simply diverted from one area to another. if the latter, it could as easily have been a hemi four speed car, but perhaps not been the best color combo, at least in my biased opinion.
You go on bing.com enter XX29L or XX29L9 on search many daytona vins comes up.
XX29L9B355126 is duplicated as #132 and #154 on the ship list.
Is there any consensus about a correction to this? And correct dealer/city for the corrected data?
I don't know if this is the right place to ask this or not, but I just happened to stumble across an orange 69 Charger Daytona in the small town of Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania. I would assume this car is accounted for in the registry, but in the rare instance it's not, I can ask the owner if he'd mind sharing the car's info with the registry. The car is located at "Muscle Car Pit Stop", which is owned by Vince Jacob (not sure if he owns the Daytona, or if it's a customer car). Anyway, just thought I'd share this here in case it's of interest to anybody.
Daytona 355148 information added to the registry spreadsheet and pictures emailed to the Registry... more pictures will be sent later.
Quote from: ksquared on March 29, 2016, 12:58:36 PM
Here are a few photos of Canadian Daytona XX29J9B414638, which of course is an original Hemi Daytona :o
These are from a discussion at:
(Anybody good at translating French?)
Here is the youtube video of Jacques Duval test driving the Hemi Daytona:
And does anyone think it would be worthwhile to have somebody attempt to contact people from these old discussions to see if they might still have the actual photos, which would hopefully be in color?
Those discussions are from a Quebec forum that I participate in and is still active. The pictures with Mr. Duval standing next to the car are from a printed annual book, Le Guide de L'Auto, don't think the originals are still available...
As for the car, it was officially scrapped in Quebec after an engine compartment fire and lost some parts while at the scrapyard, the wing is supposedly still here... The shell then resurfaced as the red car with no wing or nose. It is still in Canada, being restored, I hear...
Ben
Think I have dealer ad for 69 355148. http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,60970.0.html
Quote from: nascarxx29 on May 08, 2016, 07:58:20 PM
Think I have dealer ad for 69 355148. http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,60970.0.html
Crenshaw Dodge was not the original selling dealer, but sold the Daytona as a used car....
Doesnt shiplist show a studio dodge for 355148 N Hollwood Ca .This daytona got bounced around in Ca
XX29L9B355148 (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B0yiRxRtmJ_xbzdTcnhYcnM3ejg) pictures.
XX29L9B409073 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0yiRxRtmJ_xSUFtcURhY1FuSEE)
Today in Everett, WA.
Two more pics of XX29J9B410771 (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B0yiRxRtmJ_xWmJ2d2JDNkpJZUE) from today.
Made some updates. So far:
168 photos/docs on cars
81 fender tag info
217 VON
Jeff,
Thanks again for all the work on the registry and adding the info for the Daytona I sent you.
I was surprised when you took my information and was able to then identify a couple more pictures and add them also!
GREAT WORK!
MJ
Quote from: Mopar John on June 07, 2016, 06:11:37 PM
Jeff,
Thanks again for all the work on the registry and adding the info for the Daytona I sent you.
I was surprised when you took my information and was able to then identify a couple more pictures and add them also!
GREAT WORK!
MJ
Well, Ernie just helped out some here in the last couple of days. So credit to him too.
i'm just glad to see some headway on a more complete list. i started trying to build one years ago, but haven't had time to work on it for the last year or two.
the I.T. guy at work drives a scat pack challenger, and loves to talk mopar. We have batted around the idea of him creating a template that allows searching by individual codes, as well as adding color like i had on my old excel list. no idea if it will lead anywhere, so it's nice to help expand the effort here. for those who have never attempted to compile a list like jeff has done here, know that it is a daunting task.
jeff, once i have a chance to sort through 28,000 or so photos all dumped into one folder, i'm certain i have info on several more to send your way.
john, i need to catch up with you regarding our conversation from a year or so ago. should you recall the gist of it, it could be the time.
Send me anything and I'll incorporate it!
And - the IT guy is welcome to pull the google sheet info in to whatever searchable format/website/what-knot and update that as the google sheet fills in more. It's all open source, that was part of the point of this. :2thumbs:
I have some pics that I don't have identified. Can anyone help out which VIN these are?
#1
This one was listed for $350k.
#2
#3
This one was in Iran, maybe Canada too?
#4
#5
Shed in NY?
#6
#7 Identified: XX29J9B405189
#7 is Steve Fox's XX29J9B405189 the only red striped HEMI Daytona
i think #4 is the one gean gregory once had?
I have submitted the broadcast sheet for XX29L9B414658.
This is a rare R6 exterior with red interior Daytona!
More info soon on this one!
MJ
Quote from: Mopar John on June 11, 2016, 02:11:48 PM
I have submitted the broadcast sheet for XX29L9B414658.
This is a rare R6 exterior with red interior Daytona!
More info soon on this one!
MJ
Thanks John! I added it.
Quote from: Homerr on June 10, 2016, 11:47:17 PM
#2
Who can identify the guy in the red sweatshirt? ;)
Troy
Quote from: Troy on June 13, 2016, 10:32:22 AM
Quote from: Homerr on June 10, 2016, 11:47:17 PM
#2
Who can identify the guy in the red sweatshirt? ;)
Troy
:wave: I can answer two questions about that photo...
> 409062, the car was at Carlisle in 2004, 2006 & 2007 back when Dave E. owned it (this is the same car currently f/s in Canada discussed in this link (http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,124398.0.html) ). It might have been at Carlisle in 2005 also, but I didn't have photos of it that year... never made it to the show field side of the event that year.
> That's Chryco Psycho, making a guest appearance from Canada at Carlisle that year (either 2005 or 2006, don't remember which). Always in a sweatshirt even if it was 100* outside. :o I wonder if he still wear sweatshirts in Panama?
Quote from: Homerr on June 10, 2016, 11:46:31 PM
I have some pics that I don't have identified. Can anyone help out which VIN these are?
#1
This one was listed for $350k.
355146, I'm pretty sure
Quote from: hemigeno on June 13, 2016, 11:00:42 AM
Quote from: Troy on June 13, 2016, 10:32:22 AM
Quote from: Homerr on June 10, 2016, 11:47:17 PM
#2
Who can identify the guy in the red sweatshirt? ;)
Troy
:wave: I can answer two questions about that photo...
> 409062, the car was at Carlisle in 2004, 2006 & 2007 back when Dave E. owned it (this is the same car currently f/s in Canada discussed in this link (http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,124398.0.html) ). It might have been at Carlisle in 2005 also, but I didn't have photos of it that year... never made it to the show field side of the event that year.
> That's Chryco Psycho, making a guest appearance from Canada at Carlisle that year (either 2005 or 2006, don't remember which). Always in a sweatshirt even if it was 100* outside. :o I wonder if he still wear sweatshirts in Panama?
T-shirts - but still with black jeans.
Troy
409062 dealer town country dumfies va. http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,75320.0.html
Quote from: hemigeno on June 13, 2016, 11:00:42 AM
Quote from: Troy on June 13, 2016, 10:32:22 AM
Quote from: Homerr on June 10, 2016, 11:47:17 PM
#2
Who can identify the guy in the red sweatshirt? ;)
Troy
:wave: I can answer two questions about that photo...
> 409062, the car was at Carlisle in 2004, 2006 & 2007 back when Dave E. owned it (this is the same car currently f/s in Canada discussed in this link (http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,124398.0.html) ). It might have been at Carlisle in 2005 also, but I didn't have photos of it that year... never made it to the show field side of the event that year.
> That's Chryco Psycho, making a guest appearance from Canada at Carlisle that year (either 2005 or 2006, don't remember which). Always in a sweatshirt even if it was 100* outside. :o I wonder if he still wear sweatshirts in Panama?
Just to double check, #2, the black/red stripe car was restored to orignal EV2/black stripe?
Added pics of XX29L9B398852 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0yiRxRtmJ_xeDdaQm1CMjEyRTA). Thanks Dave!
The spreadsheet now has stats!
See the tab at the bottom. Let me know if you would like to see any other tallies or combos.
Link to spreadsheet:
1969 Daytona Registry (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eqbINFf9lxR2ofXmsvAvtFtlp-0N9CA7KoPwlKYJMw4/edit?usp=sharing)
A couple more photos of a fender tag, this time for XX29J9B409076, aka The Jim Radke Hemi Daytona (as it seems these cars will always belong to their "back in the day" owners :yesnod:)
There are also a couple more photos available, two showing the car when it was Petty Blue (if that's the right guess for the color) and one when it was either unrestored or getting ready to be restored, but I think they've already been submitted.
Thanks! Added the pics and info from tag.
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?topic=105637.0
Picture No.6, Daytona in SNOW.
It never ceases to amaze me, how your wonderful Historic road legal NASCARS were treated!
I'm surprised there are any left at ALL... :slap:
Surely they could have been put in barns and garages etc... :pity:
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?topic=86919.0
XX29L9B410774.
http://s975.photobucket.com/user/Wingcars69/media/Mobile%20Uploads/download_zpsqpa2nsok.jpg.html?filters[user]=99613491&filters[recent]=1&sort=1&o=0
Quote from: Mopar John on June 11, 2016, 02:11:48 PM
I have submitted the broadcast sheet for XX29L9B414658.
This is a rare R6 exterior with red interior Daytona!
More info soon on this one!
MJ
From Ontario? Sorry don`t remember his last name.Went like kawi*&*& or something.
R6 Daytona marc christiana maybe had it on ebay for sale 414658 sometime back with nos front valance
Quote from: nascarxx29 on July 31, 2016, 07:04:10 PM
R6 Daytona marc christiana maybe had it on ebay for sale 414658 sometime back with nos front valance
That`s his name.Talked to him years.
XX29L9B409035 (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0yiRxRtmJ_xMG5heDV0ZUlQTWs) at 2016 MCAN show.
Homerr,
I have to give you a huge THANK YOU! I love the updated spreadsheet and all the hard work you do to maintain it. It is a incredible source of information for every Daytona fan. If you ever need any help with the upkeep please feel free contact me and I will gladly help out.
Jim aka rotten1965
Homerr,
Could you add pictures of XX29L9B356534?
Recently posted as being for sale on Facebook.
Thanks! MJ
XX29L9B390020
Here are some pictures of Daytona XX29L9B390020 as shown at the 2017 Muscle Car And Corvette Nationals last weekend.
This Daytona is a long time Chicago area car formerly owned by Jo Ann Nabor.
It attended many local events as well as national wing car meets and Power tour's.
The Daytona was restored by Troy Angelly Restorations of Eldorado, Illinois.
MJ
Jo Ann's old car
XX29L9B409035
Here are some pictures of Daytona XX29L9B409035 as shown at the 2017 Muscle Car And Corvette Nationals.
This Daytona has been part of a Mopar B Body collection in the Chicagoland area.
It came out of restoration last year and shown at some local shows.
Very rare R4 red with red interior and 4 speed transmission.
MJ
Love that silver Daytona! :drool5:
Quote from: Stevetona on November 22, 2017, 05:55:27 PM
Love that silver Daytona! :drool5:
My buddy has one and says he has scene six total in A 4
There was a total of 9 A4 Daytonas made and I believe that all 9 are still with us! I find A4 as the most sexy damn color that was available on the Daytona! Unfortunately, the Hemi was never FACTORY installed in any of the 9 A4s. The (Known) 9 Vins are listed below.....can you tell I love A4 Daytonas?!! John Pappas offered to broker the purchase of Jo Ann's A4 Daytona for me back in the mid 2000s when she was considering selling it but I just couldn't scrape up the money for her asking price back then (175K+).....OUCH!
Reg. list # Vin # City/State Ship Date
182 XX29L9B386539 Detroit, MI 8/27/1969
187 XX29L9B386544 Littleton, CO 8/24/1969
240 XX29L9B390020 Auburn, WA 8/29/1969
254 XX29L9B400565 Jackson, MI 8/16/1969
310 XX29L9B402971 Kansas City, MO ? Unknown
389 XX29L9B409069 Milwaukee, WI 8/24/1969
393 XX29L9B409073 Evansville, IN 8/28/1969
461 XX29L9B414634 Hamilton, ON (Canada) 8/29/1969
498 XX29L9B419444 Lancaster, SC 8/27/1969
414626 is alive and well.
Quote from: rotten1965 on November 22, 2017, 11:16:21 PM
There was a total of 9 A4 Daytonas made and I believe that all 9 are still with us! I find A4 as the most sexy damn color that was available on the Daytona! Unfortunately, the Hemi was never FACTORY installed in any of the 9 A4s. The (Known) 9 Vins are listed below.....can you tell I love A4 Daytonas?!! John Pappas offered to broker the purchase of Jo Ann's A4 Daytona for me back in the mid 2000s when she was considering selling it but I just couldn't scrape up the money for her asking price back then (175K+).....OUCH!
Reg. list # Vin # City/State Ship Date
182 XX29L9B386539 Detroit, MI 8/27/1969
187 XX29L9B386544 Littleton, CO 8/24/1969
240 XX29L9B390020 Auburn, WA 8/29/1969
254 XX29L9B400565 Jackson, MI 8/16/1969
310 XX29L9B402971 Kansas City, MO ? Unknown
389 XX29L9B409069 Milwaukee, WI 8/24/1969
393 XX29L9B409073 Evansville, IN 8/28/1969
461 XX29L9B414634 Hamilton, ON (Canada) 8/29/1969
498 XX29L9B419444 Lancaster, SC 8/27/1969
Per Wayne 409059 is An A4 SE column shift Auto . Ray from kc , Really Overland Park Ks Had several Wing cars in the 70's , then Jerry Jeunaman owned it for a while . No idea where it is now . Waynes is 409069
Quote from: moparstuart on November 25, 2017, 08:56:09 PM
Quote from: rotten1965 on November 22, 2017, 11:16:21 PM
There was a total of 9 A4 Daytonas made and I believe that all 9 are still with us! I find A4 as the most sexy damn color that was available on the Daytona! Unfortunately, the Hemi was never FACTORY installed in any of the 9 A4s. The (Known) 9 Vins are listed below.....can you tell I love A4 Daytonas?!! John Pappas offered to broker the purchase of Jo Ann's A4 Daytona for me back in the mid 2000s when she was considering selling it but I just couldn't scrape up the money for her asking price back then (175K+).....OUCH!
Reg. list # Vin # City/State Ship Date
182 XX29L9B386539 Detroit, MI 8/27/1969
187 XX29L9B386544 Littleton, CO 8/24/1969
240 XX29L9B390020 Auburn, WA 8/29/1969
254 XX29L9B400565 Jackson, MI 8/16/1969
310 XX29L9B402971 Kansas City, MO ? Unknown
389 XX29L9B409069 Milwaukee, WI 8/24/1969
393 XX29L9B409073 Evansville, IN 8/28/1969
461 XX29L9B414634 Hamilton, ON (Canada) 8/29/1969
498 XX29L9B419444 Lancaster, SC 8/27/1969
Per Wayne 409059 is An A4 SE column shift Auto . Ray from kc , Really Overland Park Ks Had several Wing cars in the 70's , then Jerry Jeunaman owned it for a while . No idea where it is now . Waynes is 409069
XX29L9B409059 is a R4 with a white wing per the registry (several pictures)
Homerr,
Could you add some data to XX29L9B355123? The exterior color is V2 with a black interior and black wing. Mark Worman from GYC is restoring this Daytona and pulled the touch up paint (V2) out of the glove box and went over the car in detail. I'm sure some others from the forum seen the episode and could add some other option codes as well. Tony D'Agostino verified this as original paint (V2) and interior (Black) on the same episode.
XX29L9B409059
Where is XX29L9B409059 now?
We'll a couple of weeks ago it was also at the 2017 MCACN show.
Here are some pictures of it in the American Muscle Car Restorations display.
This Daytona received Concours Gold at the show!
MJ
Quote from: moparstuart on November 25, 2017, 08:56:09 PM
Quote from: rotten1965 on November 22, 2017, 11:16:21 PM
There was a total of 9 A4 Daytonas made and I believe that all 9 are still with us! I find A4 as the most sexy damn color that was available on the Daytona! Unfortunately, the Hemi was never FACTORY installed in any of the 9 A4s. The (Known) 9 Vins are listed below.....can you tell I love A4 Daytonas?!! John Pappas offered to broker the purchase of Jo Ann's A4 Daytona for me back in the mid 2000s when she was considering selling it but I just couldn't scrape up the money for her asking price back then (175K+).....OUCH!
Reg. list # Vin # City/State Ship Date
182 XX29L9B386539 Detroit, MI 8/27/1969
187 XX29L9B386544 Littleton, CO 8/24/1969
240 XX29L9B390020 Auburn, WA 8/29/1969
254 XX29L9B400565 Jackson, MI 8/16/1969
310 XX29L9B402971 Kansas City, MO ? Unknown
389 XX29L9B409069 Milwaukee, WI 8/24/1969
393 XX29L9B409073 Evansville, IN 8/28/1969
461 XX29L9B414634 Hamilton, ON (Canada) 8/29/1969
498 XX29L9B419444 Lancaster, SC 8/27/1969
Per Wayne 409059 is An A4 SE column shift Auto . Ray from kc , Really Overland Park Ks Had several Wing cars in the 70's , then Jerry Jeunaman owned it for a while . No idea where it is now . Waynes is 409069
In a letter from Wayne dated 12-1-89 he states that the A4 silver Daytona from his area is XX29L9B419444.
His notes also indicate it had a black leather interior with a 6 way seat, am/8 track, column auto with fold down arm rest and a black wing.
MJ
What was the story on the honeycomb grill in XX29L9B409059?
I thought I heard something about those a while back, but can't recall the details...
Quote from: Dave Kanofsky on November 28, 2017, 08:57:28 AM
What was the story on the honeycomb grill in XX29L9B409059?
I thought I heard something about those a while back, but can't recall the details...
Honeycomb grill screen was part of the rare 'Bee" package... :lol:
Quote from: Dave Kanofsky on November 28, 2017, 08:57:28 AM
What was the story on the honeycomb grill in XX29L9B409059?
I thought I heard something about those a while back, but can't recall the details...
when i found my superbird nose it had daytona grille mesh in it
Homerr,
I found a video on Youtube of a inspection of XX29L9B358399 that has all the fender tag info if you care to update. The Fender Tag reads as follows; N85 R11 V88 Y39 26
C55 G15 G33 J25 M21 M31
A01 A11 A36 B41 B51 C16
R4 R4 C6X X9 427 926088
D32 XX29 L9B 358399
It looks like a very nice car!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQcjU5EclWQ
Enjoy!
XX29L9B355101
Here are a couple of pictures of XX29L9B355101 as shown at the 2018 MCACN show.
This Daytona has long been noted of having the lowest vin among production Daytona's!
MJ
XX29L9B400577
Here are a couple of pictures of XX29L9B400577 as shown at the 2018 MCACN show.
Not much has been out there about this one.
MJ
Thanks John! It was a great show with 6 Daytona's included
Quote from: Mopar John on November 19, 2018, 10:18:43 AM
XX29L9B355101
Here are a couple of pictures of XX29L9B355101 as shown at the 2018 MCACN show.
This Daytona has long been noted of having the lowest vin among production Daytona's!
MJ
Just my opinion, but I liked the paint job it had in early &0's when it was my dads car better than how it is now.
What's the story on the black Hemi Daytona on the left? :drool5:
I think it a the Henry Watkins Daytona later owned by him radke
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?topic=105465.0
Updated this registry over the weekend after many months of having it on the back burner.
Thanks as always to tan top for saving the photos from ads before they disappear forever!
Seen at 2019 MCACN show!
XX29L9B381544 is going to be restored by Mike Mancicni's American Muscle Car Restorations!
sad that a nice survivor like that will be restored
Quote from: moparstuart on November 29, 2019, 03:39:48 PM
sad that a nice survivor like that will be restored
how exactly is it a SURVIVOR if it was originally GREEN? :scratchchin:
I think a "survivor" term applies to both a Day 1 and Day 2 car.
I like being able to see these Day 2 Survivors I got to know when I first joined the Aero community. I'd have to call one that is still around from the 1970's a Survivor. Loosing any to a Day 1 restoration is like loosing that comfortable flannel shirt I've had for decades (even if in no longer fits!).
- SB Steve
381544 217 nj N Plainfield Dodge N Plainfield, NJ 8/27/1969 .New Jersey car allright
Quote from: moparstuart on November 29, 2019, 03:39:48 PM
sad that a nice survivor like that will be restored
I heard another "Day 2 Survivor" Daytona will also be lost to a restoration. Sad to hear.
Surely...by definition...there is no such thing as a day two survivor. If it's not the same as it left the factory...with possible the exception of localised paint repair due to day to day damage...then it's not a survivor...and since it's (the blue Daytona) not original I think it's the prefect candidate for a restoration. But to be fair, although I can't see the interior, it does not lol like it needs much to be a nice driver as it is....wrong colour or not......but it no survivor...imo. :lol:
We agree to disagree alfaitalia ... LOL. I'm okay with it (see below).
I have a 400 mile car made in 1975. Still has factory applied window sticker on it, and it is Day 1. But I would hesitate to call that a "survivor". It had a pretty sheltered life and I think Museum Piece is more appropriate. It didn't do much to "survive".
But, on another hand, I do agree with alfaitalia that my 400 mile car did "survive" any Day 2 modifications. Hence, Day 1 survivor vs Day 2 survivor. But a car painted some "MOD" (i.e. "flower child friendly") paint scheme in 1971 that is still wearing those colors today has to be recognized for surviving this long. It is a part of MOPAR Aero Car history. That's all I'm getting at. Cheers!
I think my opinion falls somewhere between the two. If it retains nearly all of the original parts and sheet metal, I think of it as a survivor and I think of Day Two as minor changes such as aftermarket wheels. A complete color change seems a bit much for my definition of survivor. Perhaps we have come to survivors and "original" survivors?
Came across this
It's a shame that any Daytona that has a 70s paint job, wheels, tires, etc. be returned to "original".
WHY?? Hundreds of "original" looking cars already restored! Like we need another??
At this point, you have a car that is different, unique, one of a kind. A time capsule from another decade.
I'd vote to keep it that way. Besides, you can save the resto money for retirement. :scratchchin:
Quote from: odcics2 on December 03, 2019, 07:28:56 AM
It's a shame that any Daytona that has a 70s paint job, wheels, tires, etc. be returned to "original".
WHY?? Hundreds of "original" looking cars already restored! Like we need another??
At this point, you have a car that is different, unique, one of a kind. A time capsule from another decade.
I'd vote to keep it that way. Besides, you can save the resto money for retirement. :scratchchin:
Thinking about this subject the other day when this painting of a vintage guitar surfaced. In the case of the guitar, not only would restoration devalue it, it would make it "uncool". All the stories are gone. Not only that, it would generate more than a little side eye from your peers. Yet with muscle cars, if it isn't a bone stock survivor, or a beautiful restoration, there is little room for preservation of what is, and the path most often seen is restoration to a level it never had when new.
Quote from: odcics2 on December 03, 2019, 07:28:56 AM
... Besides, you can save the resto money for retirement. :scratchchin:
Bet some that do the restoration don't need to save for retirement, they already have enough.. not me though.......
Surviver i a definition..
Original is not.
K-E
Quote from: bannedbird on November 30, 2019, 06:15:25 PM
We agree to disagree alfaitalia ... LOL. I'm okay with it (see below).
I have a 400 mile car made in 1975. Still has factory applied window sticker on it, and it is Day 1. But I would hesitate to call that a "survivor". It had a pretty sheltered life and I think Museum Piece is more appropriate. It didn't do much to "survive".
But, on another hand, I do agree with alfaitalia that my 400 mile car did "survive" any Day 2 modifications. Hence, Day 1 survivor vs Day 2 survivor. But a car painted some "MOD" (i.e. "flower child friendly") paint scheme in 1971 that is still wearing those colors today has to be recognized for surviving this long. It is a part of MOPAR Aero Car history. That's all I'm getting at. Cheers!
Here are some museum "survivors"? Nothing is safe.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=corvette+museum+cave+in&qpvt=corvette+museum+cave+in&FORM=IGRE
Quote from: hemi68charger on December 03, 2019, 09:42:58 AM
Quote from: odcics2 on December 03, 2019, 07:28:56 AM
... Besides, you can save the resto money for retirement. :scratchchin:
Bet some that do the restoration don't need to save for retirement, they already have enough.. not me though.......
Amen, brother!
:cheers:
The Corvette is a different thing altogether isnt it? Did not Bloomington copyright the term "survivor" and then establish some very loose rules as to what a survivor can mean in order to satisfy the demands of the Vette crowd doing Bloomington textbook perfect restos but still wanting survivor status for their cars?
Quote from: Ghoste on December 04, 2019, 06:14:40 AM
The Corvette is a different thing altogether isnt it? Did not Bloomington copyright the term "survivor" and then establish some very loose rules as to what a survivor can mean in order to satisfy the demands of the Vette crowd doing Bloomington textbook perfect restos but still wanting survivor status for their cars?
What's a corvette? :smilielol: Sounds like Corvette folks should run for office: what a razzmatazz scam!!!
I like "back in the day" modified cars. Something done a day or year or so from NEW. Hell, that's 45+ years ago! To take a time capsule like that and restore it to "original", which a car NEVER can be if it's been restored, is awful!
Oh wait, I already stated this. :yesnod:
How many ads have you read like this? "ALL ORIGINAL, fresh paint! :shruggy: :lol:
All the time, and usually the word "survivor" is tossed in there someplace as well. :lol:
Anyones
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,114208.0/all.html
cool, that 054 fender tag is one digit after mine
Just have been updating the registry. Nothing earth-shattering for all the regulars here, just caught up with the last 16 months or so of adding pics and a couple fender tags that have been posted here.
Hi Homerr, 17 October 2020
Thanks for the thread and all your hard work and effort. We found our Daytona was the 140th built and the 10th Hemi.
Best Always,
426 Hemi Chicks
Updates to the Daytona registry today. Various pics and fender tag data added/fixed.
Am I correct in assuming that if the VIN is XX29L9B ****** that the car is a real 500 or Daytona?
Sorry if that's a dumb question. I'm new at this.
Quote from: Tuco on July 08, 2021, 08:53:27 AM
Am I correct in assuming that if the VIN is XX29L9B ****** that the car is a real 500 or Daytona?
Sorry if that's a dumb question. I'm new at this.
XX makes it an aero car but not all aero cars were XX some were XS on the vin
Thanks 70 sublime. Just making sure I'm not getting a clone.
Check the list to see if the car you are looking at is listed by the numbers
Yes. It's listed but no info other than CA. Thanks.
On a side note I saw a video where a guy was inspecting a Daytona Charger and he mentioned that they all had wood grain dash inlays. Yet I see most of the guys building clones with a black dash. Were the originals equipped with wood grain dashes or black or could they be either?
Quote from: Tuco on July 08, 2021, 11:12:35 AM
Yes. It's listed but no info other than CA. Thanks.
On a side note I saw a video where a guy was inspecting a Daytona Charger and he mentioned that they all had wood grain dash inlays. Yet I see most of the guys building clones with a black dash. Were the originals equipped with wood grain dashes or black or could they be either?
Only ones with wood grain inlays are SE cars.
Caught up through today on posts here. Added pics for a dozen or so Daytonas.
As you may have noticed I've not had time to maintain the registries. I have made partner in the business I'm at and am now buying the business, hence the lack of attention here.
I know google has broken links over time and several of you have messaged about cars, but the registry should be considered not maintained after June 2022. The site will stay up as-is but I am also providing a link below to all the content currently there including the pictures and spreadsheet in hopes that someone else can take it to the next level.
1969 Charger Daytona Registry part 1 (244mb) (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_xA-js6svh590RbgTltn4Hc9rLKtmt95/view?usp=sharing)
1969 Charger Daytona Registry part 2 (278mb) (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ESTas34PBI0_CUTj9INPzYyn3kC3EIHF/view?usp=sharing)
thank you Homerr for all you have done , in this registry ! :cheers: :cheers: :cheers: good luck with your new business venture :yesnod: :2thumbs:
Thanks TT!
Hoping this is a (belated) template to pass on registries! :wave: