:coolgleamA: don't look F3 , :shruggy: , could be computer monitor though :slap: , :scratchchin: because the F5 one in the other thread looks F8 to me :P :shruggy:
http://vanguard.dealeraccelerate.net/vehicles/1829/1969-Dodge-Charger-500
XS29L9B217178
:popcrn:
:popcrn:
http://vanguard.dealeraccelerate.net/vehicles?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q%5Bftx_search_cont%5D=dodge
must of just got it , :yesnod: normally they post good videos on youtube !! :coolgleamA:
https://www.youtube.com/user/Vanguardmotorsales/videos?sort=dd&view=0&shelf_id=0
Looks like the one Dean Herron had for sale earlier this year and they think they can 2x their $$$ :rofl:
Someone painted it F6.
Dave
QuoteLooks like the one Dean Herron had for sale earlier this year and they think they can 2x their $$$ rofl
Someone painted it F6.
Dave
This one has been painted F6 since at least Oct 2011....... the last time I saw it. Build sheet says F3.
:o :smilielol:
Wow, that is one of those rare late year F6 500s. Ok, F3 seem fairly rare for 500s, I would not be embarrassed owning it, if it was F3. Fair amount of money to change it back it that was desired by someone.
we got an F3 500 up here...I like it better than whatever green the one is above
Quote from: A383Wing on March 23, 2015, 08:42:20 PM
we got an F3 500 up here...I like it better than whatever green the one is above
Looks like they were chasing F6.
Wow, same production date as mine, and the Vin is in between mine and the broadcast sheet I found in the back seat. They might have shared the shop floor at Creative.
got some good pictures up on the Vanguard site
shame its not the original F3
got a video up now too :yesnod:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcPUL3Xi_Ec
:popcrn:
:popcrn: :scratchchin:
:popcrn:
:scratchchin:
:popcrn:
:popcrn:
:popcrn:
:scratchchin: :yesnod:
:popcrn:
:scratchchin:
:scratchchin:
:yesnod:
:scratchchin:
:popcrn:
:popcrn:
:scratchchin: :yesnod:
:yesnod: :scratchchin: :scope: :o ... :popcrn:
Give that fender tag and engine VIN stamping a hard look.....
Wow, Vin # one after mine.
Quote from: johntpr on May 27, 2015, 05:43:37 PM
Give that fender tag and engine VIN stamping a hard look.....
:iagree:
Quote from: Aero426 on May 28, 2015, 08:44:12 AM
Quote from: johntpr on May 27, 2015, 05:43:37 PM
Give that fender tag and engine VIN stamping a hard look.....
:iagree:
What am I missing? Someone please enlighen the lesser informed of false presentations.
Then they will know how we know and get better at what they do....
Quote from: 73rallye440magnum on May 28, 2015, 12:31:38 PM
Quote from: Aero426 on May 28, 2015, 08:44:12 AM
Quote from: johntpr on May 27, 2015, 05:43:37 PM
Give that fender tag and engine VIN stamping a hard look.....
:iagree:
What am I missing? Someone please enlighen the lesser informed of false presentations.
I am not well educated on 500s, but shouldn't the K-frame have a skid plate on it? :shruggy:
Quote from: Wingnut426 on May 28, 2015, 01:58:47 PM
I am not well educated on 500s, but shouldn't the K-frame have a skid plate on it? :shruggy:
Nope.... in '69, only the j-codes would have gotten that.............. Both my previous C500's had the standard V8 k-frame........
:popcrn:
Well if original tag existed, along with proofing what is noted above checked....and checked out as nice original 500 body... and you add 7-15k depending on where you are if you can't do it yourself to put it back F3..... that would be a swell car. Looks nice, just not in F6. That would be like buying a GNX painted silver.
If I recall, this car did not have a fender tag when it was at Carlisle. Broadcast sheet is with car now. I hooked the old owner up with it.
The fender tag looked incredibly well preserved.... :D
Quote from: 73rallye440magnum on May 28, 2015, 12:31:38 PM
Quote from: Aero426 on May 28, 2015, 08:44:12 AM
Quote from: johntpr on May 27, 2015, 05:43:37 PM
Give that fender tag and engine VIN stamping a hard look.....
:iagree:
What am I missing? Someone please enlighen the lesser informed of false presentations.
yea, I'm curious also
Quote from: johntpr on May 28, 2015, 01:56:51 PM
Then they will know how we know and get better at what they do....
Quote from: 73rallye440magnum on May 28, 2015, 12:31:38 PM
Quote from: Aero426 on May 28, 2015, 08:44:12 AM
Quote from: johntpr on May 27, 2015, 05:43:37 PM
Give that fender tag and engine VIN stamping a hard look.....
:iagree:
What am I missing? Someone please enlighen the lesser informed of false presentations.
Please don't allow the indicators of flukes to not be passed on to the next generation of Mopar purists. Send a PM if you'd like! :cheers:
QuoteIf I recall, this car did not have a fender tag when it was at Carlisle. Broadcast sheet is with car now. I hooked the old owner up with it.
I like to hear stories like this. Great job! :cheers:
As far as the fender tag goes, my only comment is that it looks far too perfect, meaning perhaps it is a reproduction off the build sheet the owner now has. He's super lucky he was able to get ahold of the build sheet if the tag was in fact AWOL.
Given that it has its build sheet, the repro tag isn't that big a deal.
Nice car, too bad it is priced as if it completed the restoration that it really needs.
Tag is obviously a repro. No bent corner is big indicator, but there are more.
Engine stamp is suspect. If hard drive had not crashed I know I had picture of trans stamp.
Is that block 12th of the 10th month?
My 500 is the last day of production Dec 19th. 1968.
I will see what mine says???
5J
For 95 large, the grille shouldn't look like this.
(http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=116899.0;attach=240675;image)
Quote from: Mytur Binsdirti on June 14, 2015, 06:47:57 PM
For 95 large, the grille shouldn't look like this.
(http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=116899.0;attach=240675;image)
:iagree:
The original block for this car has surfaced...OOPS... :popcrn: :popcrn: :popcrn: