News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

'69 B Body Alignment Specs.

Started by mr. hemi, June 27, 2020, 09:35:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

mr. hemi

Apologies if the query has been answered previously, however a search did not come up with the exact question.

I have just replaced the rear springs and torsion bars on my '69 Charger R/T. Will be setting the ride height to stock specs and getting an alignment done. All suspension components are stock with only about 18000 miles on them. I realize the current thinking is to get as much caster into it as you can, especially if using radial tires. Now I just noticed that the FSM manual lists a different caster spec for manual steering (-1/2 deg.) as opposed to power steering at (+3/4 deg.). I do not know what it was aligned to previously.

Is there any reason not to adjust to maximum positive caster with the manual steering? I assume the original thinking was to make it easier to armstrong the steering wheel. The car will normally be on P255/60R-15 radials on 8" rims. Occasionally will be fitted with stock F70-15 redlines.

Thanks in advance.
You know you are vintage when someone says, "Back in the day", and you can dispute their facts.

XH29N0G

You probably know more about this than I do, but I will contribute what I was advised in case it answers your question.  There are definitely others who know more. 

What I understand is that the original alignment specs were for bias ply tires and radials require, can use, something different and that the alignment process has changed for some places.  For instance, my place couldn't take specific numbers and input them into their system, but wanted to know specific model car.  What I was told was that getting to the 2005 mustang alignment specs was just outside the range of the original equipment suspension travel but that this would get close to the optimal setting for the original equipment suspension.  My understanding is if suspension parts are changed then further options are available.

I'll wait for others to chime in.   :popcrn:
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

birdsandbees

We tried throwing in some extra positive caster when we did my Bee last Spring and it's a tiring drive on Goodyear Redstreaks and doing some pulling right. Both something I never found in the 40+ years I've drove this car and the car has always been on bias plies. When this C19 shit has tamed down I'm going back for the stock alignment set up, that is actually in their alignment rack computer.

If you are on radials, it's a whole nuther game.
1970 'Bird RM23UOA170163
1969 'Bee WM21H9A230241
1969 Dart Swinger LM23P9B190885
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S
1966 Plymouth Satellite HP2 - 9941 original miles
1964 Dodge 440 62422504487

c00nhunterjoe

If you go to a shop and they ask you what car you want it programmed to, or look at you funny, walk away.
 
1/8" toe in, negative .5 to .75 camber, max positve caster capable. With stock parts you can usually get 2 degrees.