News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

8 3/4 rear question.

Started by XXSpiralXX, August 29, 2005, 08:20:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

XXSpiralXX

   I know theres two different casting numbers. Which one is the good one and which one is the non rebuildable type? Is that the 452 ?

MoparYoungGun

The 452 is a head casting number, I'm pretty sure it wasn't a rear end casting number. The two rear end casting numbers are the 742 and 489. I believe that the 489 was used in '69 and after, the 742 being used in '68 and earlier. I'm not sure which is rebuildable or anything technical like that. Good luck :cheers: !

RD

there are many cases actually, but the main ones are the 741, 742, & 489.  there are some 488's and ones prior to the 741 case.
67 Plymouth Barracuda, 69 Plymouth Barracuda, 73 Charger SE, 75 D100, 80 Sno-Commander

8WHEELER

The 741 742 and 489 cases are good units, If you are getting a sure grip I prefer the clutch style.

Dan
74 Dart Sport 360, just for added fun.

Nacho-RT74

Venezuelan RT 74 400 4bbl, 727, 8.75 3.23 open. Now stroked with 440 crank and 3.55 SG. Here is the History and how is actually: http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,7603.0/all.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,25060.0.html

KMPX2

I don't think that it is that some are rebuildable and some are not. It is that some are stronger than others.

BigBlockSam

i have a 489 in my 68 r/t and in my 69 se and will have one in my 69 satellite, as soon as i install it.   :sleep:
I won't be wronged, I wont be Insulted and I wont be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to others, and I require the same from them.

  [IMG]http://i45.tinypic.com/347b5v5.jpg[/img

SpudRacer

Quote from: Nacho-RT74 on August 29, 2005, 11:30:52 PM
LOOOOOTS of info here:

http://www.autohobbydigest.com/8_75.html

W O W ! ! !   This site has tons of info, enough to satisfy anyone's appetite for knowledge on the Chrysler 8-3/4" rear end.

Many Thanks,

Tom
Bryson City, NC
69 R/T SE Turquoise
Tom
Bryson City, NC
69' Charger R/T SE Turquoise

XXSpiralXX

  Ok it was the cone vs the clutch style that I was thinking of. Thanks guys!!