charger stuff ******updated***** page 37 on April 20th 2024

[tan top]

  blue 68 with white top ,

20 seconds  in  again at 3 minutes 21 seconds

few A bodies  too

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Jaqh5FvjY

[tan top]

 cant remember seeing this advert before ... although kind of looks familiar   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiPWpHLQE9A

[VegasCharger]

cant remember seeing this advert before ... although kind of looks familiar   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiPWpHLQE9A

Thanks TT.

I remember seeing this commercial somewhere recently.

[BDF]

 

[tan top]

 

http://oac.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt9k4016b2/?brand=oac4

[tan top]

[tan top]

looks like another sideways arrow on sail panel of a 68 ...... 

[70B5Cuda]

This is one o my favorite threads on this site. I love vintage Charger pictures!

[Lennard]

This is one o my favorite threads on this site. I love vintage Charger pictures!

[Ghoste]

Count me in on that also, it's a great thread!

[timmycharger]

 

[tan top]

 

[Lennard]

 

[tan top]

heres  Ghoste's  awesome  thread ,  more hours of  charger spotting etc        
i put a link here so might be easier to find for newer members   ,


http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html  ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

more stuff   from mo stuffs awesome site

 
http://mostuffsthlm.tumblr.com/page/8

[Kern Dog]

Those dirt track 70 Chargers look as if the fenders are shorter than production cars. The whole front end seems shorter.
I used to think that the 1970 fenders were longer than the 68 and 69 cars. I measured them and the fenders are actually the same length. The 70 bumper adds 2 1/2" to the end of the fender so it gives the illusion of a longer front end. The 68-69 fenders curve out at the edges/in toward the center. The 68-69 hood is surely shorter.

[Bad B-rad]

I love this thread!!!!!!!!!!!!
SO MANY cool photos!!
ON tan tops reply # 555 there is a photo/ side veiw of a blue  Charger race car(#92) is this a 1969 with a 70 front,grill/bumper and fenders?
Because I noticed the 500/Daytona rear window, I thought that in 1970 Charger 500's were regular rear windows, and no A-pillar mounding, just a trim level option?
I get that race cars are banged up and prob use any parts they have pr can get,to keep it nice and race ready, but I saw this and was just wondering.

[Bad B-rad]

I also noticed a few Chargers with the "Shelby cobra/ corvette style side pipe exhaust"  they look  really cool, not for my car,  must have been a 70's thing
(last photo in post 561, and again 5 photos down on 563, I think on purple and black Chargers, just to name a few)
very cool, it is cool to see some of the "fads" of the times that go in and out of style on these classic cars!!!!!!!

[alfaitalia]

Those dirt track 70 Chargers look as if the fenders are shorter than production cars. The whole front end seems shorter.

I see what you mean but it's just an illusion created by the huge amount the fenders are cut out backwards and forwards to fit those massive tyres in!

[Kern Dog]

You are right..it is a matter of distorted proportions.

[Ghoste]

I also noticed a few Chargers with the "Shelby cobra/ corvette style side pipe exhaust"  they look  really cool, not for my car,  must have been a 70's thing

It was very much so.  Air shocks, tiny steering wheels and the fat fat tires as well.  lol

[tan top]

   all on ebay now

[tan top]

 

[ODZKing]

Interesting, a 73 with a 426 hemi. Not an option in 73.

[hemigeno]

I'm not sure they were still racing the Hemi in '73.  I am pretty sure there was a 7.0L maximum displacement rule at the time, so any manufacturer's wedge engine could be up to 429ci.

There are some guys on here who know that period quite well and might chime in with the details.

[ODZKing]

I'm not sure they were still racing the Hemi in '73.  I am pretty sure there was a 7.0L maximum displacement rule at the time, so any manufacturer's wedge engine could be up to 429ci.

There are some guys on here who know that period quite well and might chime in with the details.

I didn't know specific numbers but thought similar. None the less, that IS a 73 (or 74) Charger #25 in the pic.